Flood Action Group

Home » Flood Action Group

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

Comments on the Surface Water Drainage Review – survey for Defra

We strongly support the Review and our comments are set out below. These are not in any way comprehensive but they do draw on our own experiences in the field. In view of the importance given by Defra and the EA to Community Input to their projects – including the ongoing one in The Corvedale - we hope that our comments are given due regard.

1              Natural Flood Management (NFM) in general

The unconventional range of procedures used for NFM quite possibly do not fall within existing legislation – as that deals more with conventional engineering and building works - and it may well be that this needs revisiting to keep it relevant.

In particular, it may in some instances be necessary to use Compulsory Powers – with all necessary safeguards - if land owners are otherwise unwilling to allow the construction of NFM structures in situations where their deployment is essential to prevent flooding downstream..

Access across private land to these structures for subsequent maintenance and/or monitoring purposes can also be problematical although it is recognised that outside of emergencies, such access visits should not interfere with normal agricultural practices. Perhaps some sensitive legislation could help with this.

2              Leaky dams

Clarity is required on responsibilities for possible downstream flooding resulting from the failure of one or more leaky dams – possibly constructed on land belonging to several different owners.

Ownership of leaky dams and responsibility for their future maintenance and possible future renewal also requires clarification.

3              SUDS structures

All such structures should conform to the requirements of the Building Regulations which may themselves require amendment to encompass less conventional approaches. The Draft Code of Practise produced by British Water should be the guideline for the design of SUDS features.

LLFA’s and/or their Agents should monitor the construction of all SUDS structures which are required under a Planning Approval – perhaps best carried out by the enhanced use of Building Inspectors as they check the rest of the building works at different construction stages.

The Register of Surface Water Assets should include all those Assets on private property which should be formally “designated” and it should be kept up to date with each new owner made aware of their existence, dimensions, location and purpose. A site location plan should be used for this purpose.

LLFA’s and/or their Agents should ensure that all necessary ongoing maintenance of SUDS structures (including their eventual replacement) is carried out in perpetuity by the builder and all subsequent owners. To achieve this, the scope of Local Authority Searches should be expanded to include these Assets – their location, dimensions, use and maintenance requirements – using the location plans recommended above. The need to keep such Assets available for inspections should be highlighted to prospective owners who should also be made aware that they are not allowed to alter the “designated” structures without first having applied for permission from the relevant Authority. The above applies equally to situations where one SUDS facility serves multiple building ownerships although in this case, some form of legal Agreement would be required to which all new owners would have to sign up.

The Legal Profession when Conveyancing properties, should be under a legal obligation to notify prospective purchasers of the existence of these Assets and their responsibilities in terms of ongoing inspection/maintenance/replacement requirements.

4              CIL Monies

There seems to be no formal control over how these monies are used. Sometimes they are not available for use in building necessary upstream flood prevention measures but are instead put to different uses by Councils. This situation needs regularising.

5              OWC’s

The cost of obtaining necessary Ordinary Water Course Consents is considerable (even though the swingeing increases in these costs recently requested by the EA were not allowed) and act as a deterrent to local Flood Action Groups who generally have only limited funding. The use of a proportion of such limited funds for administrative purposes goes against logic. Such Consents should be freely available for bona fide uses by Flood Action Groups.

6              Roadway gullies etc in Public Highways

The Registers of Surface Water Assets as they relate to those Assets on public highways are frequently fragmented and out of date. Although in theory these Registers exist, often the only record of the existence and location of the Assets is in the minds of long term employees of the LLFA’s. Once these individuals retire or are replaced by Contract staff, this knowledge is lost to the Authorities. All such Registers should be updated and then kept up to date with the data stored securely and made available to any bona fide and relevant organisation such as a Flood Action Group who may require it.

The necessary regular maintenance of these structures seems to no longer take place leading to unnecessary, preventable flooding. Undersized structures also lead to flooding and surely the Highway Authorities should ensure that such items – whether existing or proposed - are so sized as to be fit for purpose?

It seems to us that the prioritisation of works by the Highways Authority in the field of surface water drainage is not always decided on a rational basis ie those required most urgently are not always those given priority. There are no doubt reasons for this situation but in our view the present method used for allocation of job priorities needs revisiting.

7              Agricultural run off

In rural areas, particularly where there are sunken lanes, the ground water from land drains etc often ends up in roadway drainage systems. Surface run off - particularly from grass lands - also ends up in roadside drains and in heavy storms, top soil also gets onto roads. Is this situation dealt with in existing legislation or is new legislation required?

8              Riparian Ownership

This whole topic seems to be a legal minefield where as laymen it seems impossible to get answers as to who owns what and whose responsibility it is to maintain watercourses on or adjacent to private properties. Clarity on this issue would be most welcome.

Geoff Neden

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

23rd November 2019

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

Progress Report #15

November 2019

The flood event that occurred on the 26th October is reported on in full on our web page below. In summary, it appears that if the rainfall was similar to that which occurred in the 2012 floods, then there is a good chance that the leaky dams have been successful in reducing the flood level in Mill Lane Diddlebury by almost a foot (300mm). The flooding did show up some gaps in the pointing of the wall by the Mill Lane bridge and these have now been filled. We plan a survey of the leaky dams to see if they have suffered any damage from recent flood events but this will have to wait until the end of the shooting season in February 2020.

One property in Lower Corfton did flood and we had a site meeting on 12th November with the Council and the Highways dept at which they promised to investigate the problem here and come up with a solution. Unfortunately before this could take place, the more recent flooding on 14th November led to further flooding of the same property. We are pressing the Highways dept to act swiftly. Elsewhere, there was serious flooding of roads in the Parish but thankfully not of properties with the above exception.

Middlehope was unscathed by the more recent flooding but were cut off for a day by the combination of road works on the road to Diddlebury and flooding by Preens Barn on the road to Westhope. We are arranging a site meeting with Highways to see what can be done at this point as it was also flooded on November 26th.

The NFF are following up their October Meeting at Culmington with a further one in Beambridge starting at 6.30pm on Tuesday 7th January to further the establishment of the Corvedale Flood Forum. The Group are preparing their response to a nationwide Surface Water Drainage Review funded by Defra. Once finalised, this will be published on our web page.

It may be necessary to have one more working party to clear the stream at the bottom of Mill Lane and if so, I will send out a request for volunteers.

Geoff Neden

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

November 2019

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

Launch of National Flood Forum (NFF) Charter

Churchill Room, House of Commons

5th November 2019 – (a significant day to be there but they had checked the cellars)

I attended this event along with representatives of around 30 other Flood Action Groups from all round the Country and other interested parties such as the BRE.

The event was hosted and introduced by Rachael Maskell MP, who became involved in flood prevention after disastrous floods in her York Constituency.

Next was Mark Hoban, the Chair of Flood Re – the Insurance back up organisation set up by Government to run for a limited duration to ensure that all householders including those with a history of flooding can still get Insurance and at reasonable rates.

We were then addressed by Emma Howard Boyd, the Chair of the Environment Agency who confirmed the Agency’s determination to address flooding problems countrywide and who also pointed out the worsening effects brought about by climate change.

Finally, we were addressed by Paul Cobbing, the Chair of the NFF who described the process leading up to the launch of the Charter today and its main points.

A summary of the Charter is attached below.

Talking to these people brought up a couple of things which we were already exercised over. One is the lack of manpower and/or other problems in Councils leading to an insufficient standard of inspection during the construction phase of new buildings – in particular ensuring that all the SUDS features required under Planning Approvals are actually built and to the required Specification. Following on from this, there seems to be no Statutory requirement for Councils to check that such SUDS structures that are built are subsequently properly maintained. It is all very well to build an underground storage facility but if it fills with silt over the next few years, it ceases to function and the expectation of no run off in excess of the green field rate is no longer met. This is made more difficult as the properties in question are sold on. Suggestions were that the Legal profession could become involved during the Sale process to ensure that prospective new owners were made aware of the existence of such structures (they should be marked on site plans) and their responsibility to maintain them. Local Authority Searches should also flag up this information.

All in all an interesting meeting where I met new people involved in the flood management field – many of whom had far greater problems than us.


Geoff Neden

7th November 2019

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group


Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

Report on Flood Event of 26th October 2019

Diddlebury village

After several days of rain, the Diddle Brook (measured under the road bridge on the B4368) started to rise during the afternoon of Friday 25th. It exceeded the lower alarm level (0.3m) at 6.30 pm. The level continued to rise overnight, crossing the higher alarm level (0.8m) at 10.00 am on the 26th and peaked at about mid day on the 26th at just below 0.9m.

Water started to be forced out of the water course via a grip, between the road bridge and the foot bridge at the bottom of Mill Lane from about 10.30 onwards. The minor road outside Diddlebrook Barn was then flooded and this water eventually flowed round the end of Diddlebrook Barn and along the farm track towards the Malt House. It re entered the watercourse at the bend before the Malt House. The grounds of Delbury Hall below the Malt House were inundated.

Water started to overflow the banks of the brook in the garden of Glebe Farm at about 11.00 and this drained into the roadway causing flooding in Mill Lane at the bend by Glebe Cottage. The previous owners of Glebe Cottage (it has just changed hands) had had waterproof rendering applied to the front of the house and installed two flood gates. The flood level peaked about halfway up the rendering and did not reach the flood gates.

The two flood gates in the green way between Glebe Farm and Willowbrook worked well, allowing flood waters through and by today they had returned to their normal vertical configuration. Flood water did stand in the green way, covering the sump of the Severn Trent owned sewage pumping station but not entering the control kiosk which is on a plinth. The sump cover is not watertight so flood water must have been pumped for a time. Flood water did not pass along the greenway to discharge into Mill Lane as has happened on previous occasions.

The recently jetted storm water pipe down Mill Lane worked well and there was no appreciable surface water flooding down the roadway despite there being a large run off from the Pinstones road which crossed over the B road to enter Mill Lane.

The highest level of flood water in this area was some 300mm lower than it had been in 2012. This is quite an accurate measurement as in 2012 it rose to the bottom of the Diddlebrook Barn air bricks whereas this time it peaked 300mm below that height.

The flood water was dotted with woody debris as well as sleepers etc from ornamental bridges laid across the brook in the gardens of properties fronting Mill Lane and through whose rear gardens it flows. This makes one wonder if any damage occurred to the 50 leaky dams in the Diddle Brook upstream of the village.

Anecdotal evidence points to the event being substantially larger than that in 2018 and probably equivalent to the 2012 event. The 2007 event was probably even more severe.

It would be a useful exercise to correlate rain fall as measured in Gauges on Wenlock Edge with the flood event periods mentioned above (July 2007, July 2012, 30th May 2018 and 26th October 2019). This is very pertinent as if the 2012 rainfall was approximately equivalent to the recent event, then it seems likely that the leaky dams installed in the interim might have lowered the flood level in the village by 300mm. In fact this figure should probably be a little lower as the length of watercourse involved has been straightened since 2012 and it has been kept clear of weed growth, siltation etc. Even so, it would appear to be a significant reduction in flood level. This data correlation should also be of use to the team from Cardiff University.

The flood waters receded quickly after the peak as usually happens but by then, the damage has been caused.

Elsewhere in the Parish

The Pye Brook in Peaton came up but not quite far enough to flood adjacent properties. The road from Peaton to Diddlebury was flooded on the Peaton side of the River Corve bridge and the river was running at the underside of the bridge deck.

In Middlehope, the situation was rather anomalous. Given that in May 2018 one house there was seriously flooded whereas there was no flooding in Diddlebury one would have expected, due to the flooding taking place in Diddlebury this time, for it to be worse than 2018 as no flood alleviation work has been carried out above Middlehope in the meantime. In fact the situation in Middlehope was not bad and no flooding of property occurred. It may be that the spatial distribution of the rainfall was such that tributaries entering the Diddle Brook below Middlehope carried more water this time. Supporting this theory is the fact that flooding in the vicinity of Preens Barns, between Middlehope and Burwood was as bad this year as it was in 2018. Other factors include preventative measures taken by the owner of the house that flooded in 2018 in the meantime and possibly the fact that farmland between Middlehope and Wetmore which was grassland in 2018 is now ploughed.

In Lower Corfton, Karray Cottage was flooded to a depth of some 75mm. The cottage lies at the low point of the (approximately north/south) lane leading down into Lower Corfton from the B4368 which then rises again towards Christmas Cross as a green lane. In addition, it sits alongside a stream running approximately west to east and which crosses the lane beside the Cottage. The riparian owner of this stream downstream of the Cottage cleared out her length last year and it ran freely. The problem here is that water gathers at the low point from all 4 directions. The stream passes beneath the lane in a culvert which is inadequate or blocked which means that all water gathering to the west of the low point has to pond to a sufficient height to cross over the lane and find its way into the stream below the low point. In so doing, it exceeds the height of the Cottage floor level leading to flooding. The Flood Action Group has been asking Highways Dept for nearly 3 years to investigate the local drainage and sort out this problem but nothing has happened resulting in the flooding of the Cottage. Mr Chris Jackson who used to work for Highways in the Craven Arms Depot carried all the necessary knowledge of Lower Corfton drainage in his head but sadly had to retire due to ill health. If it is possible to contact him and he is willing and able to help, he could be extremely useful.


Graph from depth recorder under bridge                                                                                                       Flooding along minor road alongside Diddlebrook Barn



   Farm track towards Malthouse                                                                                                                             Delbury Hall lawns



 Flood water emerging from Glebe Farm garden                                                                                                Flood water in road beside Glebe Cottage


 Flood gate by Willowbrook                                                                                                                            Flood gate by Glebe Farm


Sewage pumping station under water in green lane by Willowbrook                                                                          Air brick at Diddlebrook Barn - about 300mm above road level


The River Corve below the bridge on the Diddlebury to Peaton Road                                                                              Pye Brook in Peaton


Flooding at Middlehope                                                                                                                                  Flood water overtopping pipes in Middlehope


Flooding by Karray Cottage, Lower Corfton                                                                                                           Flooding inside Karray Cottage


Geoff Neden

28th October 2019

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group


Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

Progress Report #14 October 2019

Since our last Progress Report, the FAG has held a Multi Agency Meeting (MAM). Members also attended the initial meeting held at Culmington, of the Corvedale Flood Forum – a grouping of all FAG’s in the Corvedale – arranged by the National Flood Forum (NFF).

The MAM was attended by John Bellis, the newly appointed Drainage and Flood Risk Manager for Shropshire Council. This post has been empty for 3 years which has led to increasingly poor service being received by groups such as ours. John – who used to work for Telford Council and who sits on the Steering Committee - is in my opinion just the right man for the job and I look forward to a far better response from the Council in the future when he has had a chance to catch up.

I attended a Steering Group Meeting this month at which the leader of the Cardiff University Project gave a detailed update of their work on monitoring the performance of the leaky dams in the Corvedale. An Information Sheet describing their work has been prepared and will be circulated shortly. Future funding from DEFRA for NFM (Natural Flood Management) flood prevention works depends on a successful outcome from this work.

Last month we held a Working Group which cleared the Diddle Brook in the village of excess weed growth, silt etc and this has prepared it for the winter rains. Stephen Povall kindly removed the material we excavated from the stream. Recently there have been sightings of a Kingfisher beside this stretch of the stream.

Shropshire Wildlife Trust (SWT) plan further work above Middlehope and at Heath. The project by the Small Woods Association to use coppice bundles to prevent soil erosion and nitrification of watercourses has commenced on land owned by Stephen Povall.

Luke from the SWT together with Stephen Povall the land owner have walked across his land in the Corfton catchment with a view to seeing if there are possibilities for managing the land in such a way as to further minimise run off.

We continue to push for better use to be made of CIL funds and also for future monitoring of SUDS schemes after their approval by the Council.

In November I will attend a Conference in London arranged by the NFF and Flood Re and which will be addressed by the Minister for Flooding. At this event, the NFF will be launching their Flood Risk Charter.

Geoff Neden

17th October 2019

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

Progress Report #13 - July 2019

Since the last Progress Report, the FAG has held two Meetings – one of which was a Multi Agency Meeting.

Following these Meetings, we wrote to Mr Philip Dunne – our MP- regarding poor attendance and lack of response from some Agencies – particularly Highways. We also expressed our concern over the Shropshire Council’s apparent hijacking of CIL monies. He has since responded saying that he is taking these matters up with the Council. We also wrote to Viscount Boyne regarding environmental concerns at Peaton and he too has responded.

The recent Meeting held in Diddlebury between local farmers and the NFU with the SWT in attendance threw up some interesting views which have been incorporated in plans for future NFM work in the Corvedale.

A design for improving the two floating flood fences across the Diddle Brook in the green way off Mill Lane has been made and agreed with the land owners. A tender for the work has been accepted and it should soon be completed.

The work funded by the Rotary Club of Ludlow has been completed.

The SWT has continued to erect more leaky dams in the Pye Brook catchment and is still looking at options above Middlehope.

Last month we held a Working Group which cleared the Diddle Brook in the village of excess weed growth, silt etc and this proved useful when we subsequently experienced heavy rains when the stream dealt with these high flows with no flooding.

A litter picking exercise on the Diddle Brook was carried out in early July and the amount of plastic waste found was far less than that collected last year. The growth of Himalayan Balsam was also much reduced from 2018.

Luke relaxes in a scavenged wheel chair after a hard morning’s litter picking

I attended a Steering Group Meeting on July 10th at which it was confirmed that Mr John Bellis from Telford Council has been appointed as Drainage and Flood Risk Manager for Shropshire Council, starting in mid September. This is good news as in my view, John is just the right person for that job and in time, I think that we will receive an improved service from the Council.

Cardiff University continues its monitoring of the leaky dams in the Corvedale. An Information Sheet describing their work has been prepared and will be circulated shortly.

Geoff Neden

11th July

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

Report on work carried out using funds kindly provided by Ludlow Rotary Cares

Last year, Ludlow Rotary Cares awarded the FAG the sum of £300 to be used in building leaky dams in the Corvedale.

Initially we hoped to use this money in the area upstream of Middlehope but this proved to be impossible so with the approval of Rotary, we instead used it to build 3 leaky dams in tributaries of the Clee Brook (which becomes the Pye Brook) in the Cold Weston area of Clee Hill. In this work we were assisted by the Shropshire Wildlife Trust who managed the physical construction work on our behalf.

The dams have now been built and we have reported back to Ludlow Rotary Cares on the successful outcome.

Full details can be found in the attached Link : https://1drv.ms/f/s!Ail_2JCfvXY5gdAsDj17-GYUn6KzLQ

The images are also reproduced below.







Geoff Neden

3rd May 2019

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

Progress report # 12 – April 2019

Since the last Report in November 2018, we have extended our membership by inviting Mr Stephen Povall to join our Group and Stephen has kindly accepted the invitation. This step was taken in order to include the views of the local farming community in our Group as they are the owners and managers of the catchments on which our rain falls and their actions have a significant effect on flooding downstream. Taking this further, we have also had discussions with the local NFU Office in the person of Sarah Faulkner. Sarah represents the farming community on the Shropshire Slow The Flow Steering Group. The NFU have discussed Natural Flood Management (NFM) with the Shropshire Council and Shropshire Wildlife Trust (SWT) for some years and aim to ensure that such proposals can be delivered within the framework of the farming business.

The NFU will be holding a Meeting in the Diddlebury Village Hall in May at which these topics will be aired with members of the local farming community.  

Stephen has already kindly volunteered to allow the Small Woods Association (based in Ironbridge) and working with Birmingham University and Earthwatch to undertake a research project to investigate the value of coppice bundles (river faggots) for the prevention of soil erosion and nitrification of water courses, on his land.

A proposed tree planting exercise arranged with the SWT in Lower Corfton had to be cancelled recently due to problems with obtaining the tree whips but we hope to proceed with this later in the year.

The work we had planned to do above Middlehope using the funds provided by Ludlow Rotary Club has had to be abandoned due to a lack of cooperation from the land owner. We hope to do alternative work there later in the year but in the meantime, Rotary have agreed that we can use the funds to do similar work elsewhere in the Corvedale – probably near Cold Weston.

Due to persistence on the part of one of our supporters, the Council have finally unblocked the storm drain below Delbury Farm entrance in Mill Lane, Diddlebury.


Geoff Neden

5th April 2019

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

One of our members, Andy Kirk attended a Conference held in Birmingham last November. It was sponsored by the National Flood Forum and entitled "Let's talk about flooding".

Andy has kindly produced a resume of the Conference and it is set out below.

The National Flood Forum

The NFF is a charity established to help, support, and represent people at risk of flooding in England and Wales.  Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group (FAG), as one of 300 flood action groups affiliated to the NFF, was invited to be represented at a conference in Birmingham last November, entitled: “Let’s Talk About Flooding”.

This was just one of a series of events held across England and Wales with the intention of bringing people, not just flood action groups, together to talk about flooding, and share successes, issues, and concerns in all areas, and to identify what progress has been made and what the priorities are for the future.

The event was supported by Flood Re, the joint Government and insurance industry initiative established to provide affordable insurance for qualifying properties at risk of flooding, or those that have already been flooded.  The day was hosted by Dr Anne Wheeler, NFF Trustee, and Paul Cobbing, NFF Chief Executive.  In their introduction they advised us that the outcomes of all these events were to be collated and taken forward to a national conference to be held later in 2019.  It is hoped that the Secretary of State for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs will address this conference.

The event in Birmingham identified the key challenges, and briefly these comprised:

Behaviours                      maintaining awareness;

                                      building relationships with communities;

                                      ‘joined-up’ thinking and action across all organisations involved in flood risk management.


Planning and                   improved control of planning and development;

development                    no building on flood plains;

                                      stricter building control regulations;

                                      future management of SUDS (Sustainable Drainage Systems) installations.


Catchment and                requires stricter legislation and guidance on managing water;

land management            engaging with landowners in a non-confrontational way.


National Flood                 independent voice for those at flood risk;

Forum roles                    advise on property resilience and resistance;

                                     take voice to Parliament;

                                     lobby Government for funding;

                                     website to allow groups to share stories and raise questions online;

                                     act as one-stop shop representing all related agencies;

                                     create database of NFM (Natural Flood Management) projects;

                                     link flood action groups across rural/urban areas;

                                     keep flooding in the public eye;

                                     create a ‘toolkit’ for flood action groups.


Policies at                      Agriculture Act, 2018 – add to list of national issues;

national level                  climate change – flood risk in the future;

                                     planning for the future – dealing with Government-level contradictions;

                                     development – not enough overall planning and a lack of control.  Need to tackle

                                     power of developers;

                                     improved Building Regulations and making houses resilient should become a national standard.


Riparian                         no enforcement of riparian responsibilities is a historical problem – the statutory system

management                  needs to change to enable enforcement;

                                     standardised riparian responsibilities document should be provided to all new householders where a riparian responsibility exists (via solicitors?);

                                     a new statutory basis for riparian management is needed – new Land Drainage Act required to cover multiple riparian ownership and new arrangements

                                     needed for urban areas.


Risk management          Environment Agency, water companies, lead local flood authorities, Highways Agency -

authorities                      transparency of their respective responsibilities.  A national standard is required;

                                     Flood Action Groups should be involved and engaged from the outset of new flood management projects – the value of people in the community

                                     needs to be recognised;

                                     decisions concerning projects and interventions should be made for the long term rather than to meet a short-term objective.


Funding                         much more funding required for infrastructure improvements nationally;

                                    ‘invest to save’ projects need to be encouraged.


Flood Action Groups       having flood risk management authorities’ representation appropriate to meetings is roles and activities important in progressing flood risk management;

                                     grant aid required for FAGs to communicate with wider communities – attend meetings, conferences, etc;

                                    managing change, maintaining continuity of FAGs and their members.


A session on individuals’, communities’, and parish councils’ actual flooding experiences followed, and discussions on successes and/or failures in early resolution of problems were debated.

Issues raised included communication – disjointed among stakeholders; insurance – insurers slow to respond and difficulties in accessing Flood Re; SUDS – responsibility for future inspection following initial installation; risk management authorities – difficulty of changing personnel in the various agencies who tend not to co-ordinate with each other.

Bob Haddon, Chairman of Shifnal Flood Partnership Group, established in January 2014, addressed the conference.  With a large amount of new residential development, Shifnal now has much experience of all the flooding issues likely to be encountered, and he advised us accordingly.  He welcomed queries from other FAGs and/or individual property owners – info@shifnalflood.org.

Paul Cobbing concluded the conference stating that now is the moment to make an impact; apart from the national conference (location and date to be advised in due course) there is also to be a funding review in 2019.  With the NFF gaining an increasingly higher profile, there is the opportunity to engage directly with the water companies, the Environment Agency, the Highway Agencies, and other bodies associated with flood alleviation.

The NFF is encouraging anybody with an interest in or a worry about flooding to become a Friend of the NFF.  It costs nothing, but the greater the number of Friends and supporters the more clout the NFF will have at central government level.  Becoming a Friend provides access to regular bi-monthly online bulletins, and also available is a live feed 24/7 national flood warning facility which covers separate classifications of flood alerts, flood warnings, and severe flood warnings at relevant locations across the country.

Become a Friend of the NFF now – sign up at nationalfloodforum.org.uk.

Andy Kirk

18th January, 2019

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

Following the recent wet weather, we took some images of the leaky dams installed in the watercourse below Wilderhope, just to the north of where the Longville Road turns off the B4368. We photographed these dams as they are more easily accessible from a Public Footpath than are those on the Diddle Brook but the same principle applies to all such installations.

As you will see from the images below, the dams are retaining substantial amounts of water  - creating stilling ponds on their upstream sides. Each dam is different but some of them appeared to be holding back up to 500mm of water. Overall, they appear to be working well and Slowing the Flow downstream.





Geoff Neden

21st December 2018

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

New Environment Act

On behalf of the Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group, a letter has been sent to our MP Mr Philip Dunne - requesting his support to the Bill for the new Act as follows:

10th December 2018

Dear Philip,

New Environment Act

The Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group is grateful for your interest in and support for the ‘Slow the Flow’ project that throughout the Corvedale catchment area has been project managed on behalf of the Environment Agency by the Shropshire Wildlife Trust. We are particularly grateful for the site visits that you have made during 2018 and for your role in securing support from the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.

You may recall that the current project is dependent upon the goodwill of landowners and their voluntary agreement to any of the proposed flood alleviation work being undertaken upon their land.

The Corvedale project has shown that the vast majority of landowners are willing to cooperate with flood alleviation works that can provide significant benefits not only to the wider community but also to their own farming activities. Unfortunately, it has also shown that there is a small minority of landowners who are unwilling to countenance any of the proposed works being undertaken, regardless of the wider benefits. It is on this aspect that the Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group is now seeking to make representations.

It is our understanding that the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs has proposed that the principle that will underpin the proposed reforms under the new Environment Act should be “public money for public benefits”. We also understand that it is likely that the relevant Bill for this Act will come before Parliament shortly. Accordingly, the Diddlebury Flood Action Group believes that the Bill and/or the associated Regulations should contain an absolute requirement for landowners to co-operate with appropriate flood alleviation works being undertaken upon their land, if they wish to continue receiving a public subsidy.

Therefore, we should be grateful if you would be a Parliamentary advocate for this perspective.

In a wider context, we fully support the Aims of the Wildlife Trusts as set out in their Campaign for a Wilder Future (https://www.wildlifetrusts.org/get-involved/campaign/wilder-future) and hope that you will also provide your support to this and assist in the passing of a strong new Environment Act.

Your sincerely

Geoff Neden


Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group


News from Corfton


Following a recent site meeting with Richard Cheal of Shropshire Council (SC) at one of the two lowest-lying locations in Lower Corfton, agreement was reached over a plan of action to reduce flood risk.  The area in question has been flooded in the past, and it is now hoped that SC’s contractors will shortly carry out emptying of road gullies and rodding of associated highway drain runs in the affected area.

The eventual highway outfall runs into a brook which ultimately joins the River Corve.  Mrs Harriet Horne of Corfton Manor has assisted in the alleviation of flood risk in this area by carrying out major clearance and de-silting of the brook to allow storm water to disperse as quickly as possible, thus further reducing risk of flooding to properties in Lower Corfton.


Before                                                                                                During                                                                                              


The Shropshire Wldlife Trust have a source of free Black Poplars and some of these are to be planted over the next few months alongside the stream at Lower Corfton in agreement with Mrs Harriet Horne.

Andy Kirk

19th November 2018

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

Progress report # 11 – November 2018

Since the last Report in July, we have had a successful stream Working Party which has cleared the stream bed through the village of excess weed growth and encroachment from the banks.


The stream after clearing up                                                                  A recent visitor

The Chairman of the Pontesbury Parish Council was shown round the leaky dams below Wilderhope earlier this week as he had expressed interest in using the same techniques in his area.

The FAG was successful in their submission for funding to the Ludlow Rotary Club and an award of £300 has been made to us. This will be used to build more leaky dams above Middlehope.

One of our members will be attending A Conference in Birmingham organised by the National Flood Forum on 10th November concerning Insurance against flooding. A Report back will be circulated to all members after the event.

The Shropshire Wildlife Trust (SWT) plans shortly to aerate 75 acres of land near Clee St Margaret. They hope that farmers will then see the benefits of this work and keep doing it themselves. Aeration of land has many benefits, one of which is to increase its capacity to absorb surface water and hence reduce run off. They have recently completed some Slow the Flow work at Heath and Tenders are out for 70 leaky dams, with a further 30 planned in the Pye Brook catchment.

Cardiff  University have started their Slow the Flow research project in the Corvedale and hope to Report by April 2021. Hopefully this work will enable promoters of Natural Flood Management techniques to quantify the results of their proposals and hence make it easier to obtain funding. This is cutting edge stuff in the Corvedale!

SWT has recently received £28,000 for tree planting with assistance from the Woodland Trust. They will initially be working near Shipton and would welcome any volunteers to assist with this work. If you are interested, please email me for more details.

In the longer term, post Brexit, the funding of farming is going to change. The FAG is considering how best to approach the local farming community upstream of problem areas to see if they are aware of the problems their present land management techniques can cause to properties downstream and to try to work with them, and the SWT to change their practices to ones less damaging and hopefully beneficial to the farmers as well. The SWT uses software called SCIMAP which can predict the effects downstream of upstream changes and this could be a useful tool to use in trying to persuade farmers to change their ways.

Geoff Neden

2nd November 2018

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group


Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

Visit to leaky dams in the Diddle Brook, 5th September 2018

The Group were kindly invited by Luke Neal of the Shropshire Wildlife Trust (SWT) to view the approximately 50 leaky dams which were installed in the Diddle Brook upstream of Diddlebury village under his direction and with the kind permission of Delbury Estate in February 2018.

The Group went firstly went to the stream near Preens Barn between Middlehope and Burwood. This is a tributary of the Diddle Brook which drains the area around Burwood. From there we went to Middlehope and saw the area which was flooded by the storm at the end of May. Finally, we went to Dunstans Lane and walked along the Diddle Brook in both directions looking at the different dam types and locations, the reasons for which Luke explained.

The dams were of differing designs. Each one is tailor made to suit the local conditions but the construction is generally as described below.

The small trees normally used for the main dam structures are placed across the stream just above bed level. Each end is fixed to the banks by staking or occasionally, the tree is pinned to the bed itself. Smaller branches and brushwood are piled against the dam on the upstream side. The idea is to trap as much of the flow as possible above the dam before it finally forces its way through thus delaying the peak flow in the stream. Each dam has only a small effect but the cumulative effect of many such dams is significant and can reduce peak flood flows by around 10%.

From the perspective of SWT, the dams also provide new areas of suitable wild life habitats and act as siltation ponds so are a win win situation. The SWT also promote other means of Slowing the Flow by aerating the soil in fields to increase the absorption of surface water and again reduce peak flows.

Images of some of the dams visited are below.





Geoff Neden


Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

West Midlands National Flood Management (NFM) Roadshow

The Environment Agency (EA) hosted this Roadshow in Worcester on 23rd May 2018.  Attendees included many representatives from local and county authorities, the Forestry Commission and DEFRA, and a significant number of EA delegates; disappointingly only three Flood Action Groups were represented.

The aim of the Roadshow was to promote understanding and to champion the use of Working with Natural Processes/Natural Flood Management (WWNP/NFM) to reduce flood risk.  This strategy provides the means to help achieve a wide range of benefits for people and the environment by taking an integrated approach to catchment management.

Strategic planning is necessary to create schemes which will provide multiple benefits focusing on the small communities which are less likely than their larger neighbours to be able to secure appropriate funding.  Building and structuring relationships between organisations, the public sector, and local communities provides proper partnerships to take projects forward.

The range of NFM solutions includes:

            - slow the flow

            - making space for water

            - diverting the flow

            - aiding filtration

            - enhanced land management.

Cost-effective solutions are required in terms of both resources and ongoing maintenance, and these can be achieved by carefully considered partnership working.

The EA has now undertaken and published 65 case studies which provide evidence-based examples of projects which have now resolved previously existing problems (see www.gov.uk/government/publications/working-with-natural-processes-to-red...).  These studies cover rivers and flood plains, woodlands, run-off, and coasts and estuaries.

DEFRA has provided funding of £15m to help in developing the knowledge to find solutions for future implementation.  This has benefited much of the country already, covering Yorkshire, the West Midlands, Wessex, Lincolnshire and Northamptonshire, Devon and Cornwall, the Solent and South Downs, and Cumbria and Lancashire.  Also proposed are GCSE/A-level educational modules to promote the multiple benefits of NFM for people, communities, and wildlife.  DEFRA/EA is also in the process of funding and preparing an NFM design guide.

Apart from stand-alone WWNP/NFM projects, it is accepted that in many cases traditional engineering solutions will still be required.  These, however, will often still benefit from being carried out in conjunction with the WWNP/NFM processes.

Much work remains to be carried out, and research, mapping and monitoring, and publication of results will continue to provide the necessary evidence in support of the use of WWNP/NFM.  (Twelve other useful sources of data were provided and these will be available from the FAG.)

Andy Kirk

August 2018


Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

Repairs to wall by Mill Lane Bridge

The re pointing work has been completed and the wall is now safe for many years to come. Our thanks to the Diddlebury Parish Council for funding this work.

Below are some before and after images

Before                                                                                                      After








Geoff Neden


Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

Litter Picking exercise

18th July 2018

The object of the exercise was to walk the length of the Diddle Brook from the Mill Lane footbridge to its confluence with the River Corve and to pick out all litter from the stream en route.

The Shropshire Wildlife Trust (SWT) kindly provided us with Hi Vis jackets, rubberised gloves, litter pickers and plastic bags in which to collect the rubbish.

Four members together with Luke Neal of the SWT did the walk this morning with the kind permission of Mr Patrick Wrigley of Delbury Estates, the land owner and also of Mr Topher Morgan and Mr Stephen Povall who farm the land.

As well as picking out the rubbish, we also destroyed a number of Himalayan Balsam plants which were growing alongside the stream.

The types of litter removed and its location were noted on a Form and this information will be fed into the SWT data base. The material was mostly plastic. The litter record Form will help the SWT to understand the sources of plastic pollution and improve the work to address this problem. They are partnered with the Marine Conservation Society and will be sharing their results with them. 80% of marine plastic pollution comes down our rivers, it’s time to stop the plastic tide!

The following images show work in progress and the total amount of rubbish collected. The rubbish will be properly disposed of.




Geoff Neden


Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

De silting exercise

4th July 2018

The object of the exercise was to remove the majority of the area of the silt build up immediately below the Mill Lane Bridge on the main road side of the stream bed. By doing so, the area of available waterway for flood flows would be significantly enlarged. This then increases the likelihood of containing future flood flows within the stream banks

The silt build up had become too large to deal with by hand so arrangements were made to borrow a suitable machine from Topher and a tractor and trailer from Andy.

The work was done this morning after the school rush traffic was over with volunteers in Hi Vis jackets controlling traffic.

Andy expertly drove all the machines and the work was completed in just under an hour. The opportunity was taken to remove two large unsightly concrete blocks which had found their way into the stream and also the heap of weeds etc which had been removed from the stream by previous working groups. The Irises along this part of the stream bank were largely preserved in the remaining strip by the roadside wall. Future maintenance will now be undertaken by the FAG during their regular working groups.

The cost of the work was met using DPC funds allocated to the FAG.

Three views taken prior to the work being carried out


The same three views taken after the work was carried out


Work in progress


Geoff Neden


Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

Progress report # 10 – June 2018

Since the last Report in January, we have had a successful stream Working Party which has cleared the stream bed through the village of excess weed growth and encroachment from the banks.

Work on de silting the Diddlebrook below the Mill Lane bridge is now scheduled for mid June in accordance with Guidelines from the EA. The necessary Consent has been issued.

In the absence of funding from any other Agencies and to avert the risk of flood damage, the DPC have kindly agreed to fund repair works to the wall beside the Mill Lane bridge as this is in a poor state of repair. The work will take place in July when the flows are low.

We can confirm that all the 50 leaky dam structures have now been completed in the Diddlebrook catchment. These were tested by the storm which occurred in the evening of Thursday 31st May. The water level at the depth gauge by the B Road bridge is shown in the graph below.

Despite quite serious flooding in Middlehope which is above the dams (estimated to have been a 1 in 20 year event and illustrated below (images by Laurie Robinson)), the stream remained within its banks through Diddlebury village. In our opinion, such severe rainfall would have resulted in flooding within the village in the absence of the 50 new leaky dams now in place below Middlehope.



Work on designing and constructing new such structures is now proceeding in the Pye Brook catchment around Clee St. Margaret and it may also be possible to add further ones upstream of Middlehope in the future.

Several of our members have volunteered to take part in a litter picking exercise sometime in June along local watercourses as part of a scheme throughout the Severn Catchment.

One of our members attended a Road Show on Natural Flood Management organised by the Environment Agency in Worcester last month and we will be commenting on this in our next Progress Report


Geoff Neden

5th June 2018

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

The Diddlebury ducks are back! Under the new Data Protection Regulations, we are unable to identify each duck by name or to provide their web address.

Geoff Neden

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

31st March 2018

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

Progress report # 9 – March 2018

Since the last Report in January, we have campaigned against the proposed swingeing increases in Consent Charges proposed by the Environment Agency for works on Main Rivers. Although the watercourses we deal with are Ordinary Watercourses whose Consent Charges are regulated by Shropshire Council, the construction of our leaky dams is carried out and funded on our behalf by the Shropshire Wildlife Trust (SWT). The SWT carries out many works on Main Rivers and the increased charges would have involved them in added costs amounting to nearly £200,000 pa in the Corvedale alone. Spending all this money on Consents would have meant that much less money being available to actually build things – not just in Main Rivers but also in Ordinary Watercourses such as the Diddle Brook as all their funds come from the same pot.

This was raised at the meeting held in Culmington in February with Mr Philip Dunne, our local MP and the DPC subsequently wrote in with their support during the Consultation Period. There was much concern over the whole Country amongst groups of volunteers such as ours and I am pleased to be able to report that the Government listened. In the recently published list of new Consent Charges, following the Consultation Period, the Consent Charges for our type of work have not been increased.

We have also written to Mr Dunne and our local Shropshire Councillor Cecilia Motley regarding the current almost complete lack of maintenance of drainage structures in the Parish. Mr Dunne has conveyed our concerns to the Council and we await their response.

In the meantime, in the absence of funding from any other Agencies and to avert the risk of flood damage, the DPC have kindly agreed to fund repair works to the wall beside the Mill Lane bridge as this is in a poor state of repair.

Roads Dept did eventually clear the blocked pipe near Patch Cottage in Sutton and water is now getting away.

We can confirm that all the 50 leaky dam structures have now been completed in the Diddlebrook catchment. Work is now proceeding in the Pye Brook catchment.

Work on de silting the Diddlebrook below the Mill Lane bridge is scheduled for early May.

Several of our members have volunteered to take part in a litter picking exercise sometime in June along local watercourses as part of a scheme throughout the Severn Catchment.

Geoff Neden

31st March 2018

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

Below are some images of leaky dams in action showing how they do have a significant effect on slowing the flow.


Geoff Neden




Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

What we do and how we can help

Flooding of your house, business premises or farm yard can be devastating. Whilst it is not possible to completely eliminate the risk of flooding, there are things which can be done to lessen its dire effects.

1)            Slowing the Flow to reduce flood peaks       


Small works carried out at a small cost are being constructed by the Shropshire Wildlife Trust on our behalf in the upper catchments of the River Corve and its tributaries and these will, by temporarily storing flood water, reduce the peak flood flows downstream.

Such works can include leaky dams, off course storage, hedge and tree planting, reduction of cattle poaching, aeration of soils so that they can absorb more water and so on. Apart from their prime purpose in flow reduction, such works can also result in improved farmlands with higher productivity.

These installations may sound so small as to be ineffective but when they are inserted in large numbers – 130 leaky dams below Wilderhope for example – they have a cumulative effect. Although such techniques – collectively known as Natural Flood Management – are quite new, such data as has been collected to date indicate that flood peaks can be reduced by around 10%. This can translate to a local flood peak level being reduced by say 3 or 4 inches and that could make the difference between your property being flooded or not.

None of this work could be carried out without the permission of the land owners.

2)            Clearing the watercourses


Before clearance                                                             After clearance     

Below a certain point in the catchment of each tributary, it becomes futile to build items such as leaky dams as by then, flood flows would wash them away. As streams enter built up areas therefore, a different approach is adopted whereby the existing watercourses are kept in such a condition that they can cope with as large a flood flow as possible. This means firstly keeping them clear of rubbish – both the stream beds and any associated culverts, drains and bridges. The stream beds and banks should be maintained by removing any build ups of silt in the beds and also taking back any banks encroaching into the stream bed – both by silt build up and excessive weed growth – so as to maintain the full stream width. Streams work best when they are straight so small kinks should if possible be straightened out. Such work will maximise the flow capacity of the watercourses. The FAG arranges regular working parties of volunteers to carry out all this maintenance work.


  Better this…                                                                                                          than this



3)            Self help


  Air brick covers                                                                                        Flood gates and waterproof rendering

If, despite all the above, water overspills stream banks and flooding results, the onus is on the property owners to protect their properties. The Shropshire Council will on request send out a survey team to assess your property and make recommendations on how best to protect it. Grants are available for some items such as flood gates and waterproof rendering and sand bags are generally available locally on request to the Shropshire Council. There are depth gauges installed on the Diddlebury and Culmington Bridges and when flow levels reach a pre -  set alarm level, a message is sent out to the local FAG. If the flow continues to rise and triggers a second higher alarm level (which has been set at a level known by experience to cause flooding), a further message is sent and the FAG can alert those vulnerable properties identified on their Flood Resilience Plan to give them time to erect their defences.

4)            Insurance

If you live in a house that has previously flooded or that is shown to be within flood risk areas on the EA mapping, your Insurance Company may decline Cover or set a very high Premium. The Government has set up a flood insurance scheme called Flood Re which will offer reasonably priced cover to such properties. Details are available from the FAG.

5)            Permissions

All the smaller tributaries of the River Corve – the Diddle Brook, Seifton Brook, Pye Brook etc are what is known as Ordinary Watercourses and come within the jurisdiction of the Shropshire Council. The Corve itself and some of the lower parts of the tributaries are known as Main Rivers and come within the jurisdiction of the EA. The work of the FAG’s falls mostly within Ordinary Watercourses and hence permissions are needed from the Shropshire Council before any works in the stream beds are carried out. Each such permission is called an Ordinary Watercourse Consent (OWC) and lasts for 3 years. The FAG can give advice on this aspect and information is also available on Shropshire Council’s website; http://shropshire.gov.uk/drainage-and-flooding/development-responsibilit...

6)            Assistance and coordination

The FAG receives much help, encouragement and support from several different organisations and Agencies including:

•             Diddlebury Parish Council

•             Shropshire Wildlife Trust

•             National Flood Forum

•             Shropshire Council

•             Environment Agency

•             Severn Trent Water

•             The local farming community

•             Local land owners

Without this support, we could not function.

There exists an embryo Corvedale Forum which will eventually link up all the existing and future FAG’s in the Corvedale to enable them to share common problems and solutions.

We maintain a Flood Action Plan which is kept up to date and which forms the Agenda for our regular Multi Agency Meetings.

With the kind assistance of the Diddlebury Parish Council, we vet all incoming Planning Applications in regard to flooding issues.

7)            Contact us

We have a dedicated page in the Diddlebury Parish Web Site at: http://www.diddleburyparish.co.uk/flood-action-group

This is kept up to date with news on events, progress reports, requests for volunteers and so on.

There are also frequent articles in the Corvedale News.

I can be contacted at: gneden@googlemail.com.


Geoff Neden



Diddlebury Parish Council Flood Action Group

As we have been lucky enough to have had a dry period with no flood events, I thought I should just remind us all of what a flood event looks like. The following images are from 2007, 2008 and 2012.




Diddlebury Parish Council Flood Action Group

Meeting held in Diddlebury Village Hall on Thursday 15th February 2018 on Shropshire Slow the Flow

Around 60 people attended the meeting including many members of the local farming community.

Andrew Osbaldison – catchment co-ordinator, Environment Agency - spoke first. He went through the new Farming Rules for Water which come into force on 2nd April. Afterwards, Andrew answered several questions from the floor.

Luke Neal – River Officer, Shropshire Wildlife Trust – then gave an overview of how Natural Flood Management, of which Slow the Flow is one important part, works and how effective it can be. He then gave an update on his present project in the Corvedale. Many leaky dams have already been installed in the Seifton Brook above Culmington and about 130 in the stream below Wilderhope Manor. Work starts on 21st February on the installation of 50 leaky dams in the Diddle Brook catchment above Diddlebury with the kind permission of Delbury Estates. Luke took several interesting questions from the floor and then showed an excerpt from the film “High Water Common Ground” which looks at Slow the Flow in practice around the Country and which included some clips about Culmington and Diddlebury.

Also present were James Turner of the Environment Agency and Anne Marie Jones who works with Catchment Sensitive Farming, run by Natural England. This organisation has grants available to carry out farm improvements with water quality benefits – yard concreting, feeder improvements, fencing, water storage etc. Her contact details are: anne-marie.jones@naturalengland.org.uk

I will provide further updates from time to time on the Corvedale Project.

Geoff Neden

16th February 2018

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group



Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group


The following images were taken at the recent meeting at Culmington Village Hall and subsequently at WestHope on the Seifton Bache when our local MP - Mr Philip Dunne, came to be briefed about the Slow the Flow concept and see it in action.

He subsequently wrote an Article on this topic which can be seen on the following link.

Slow the Flow in South Shropshire


Geoff Neden

14th February 2018

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group

Progress Report # 8 -  January 2018

The good news is that an Agreement has been reached with the local landowners which will allow a start on the construction of over 50 leaky dams in the Diddle Brook catchment in February.

Geoff attended a meeting held in Culmington on 26th January at which Mr Philip Dunne MP was briefed on the progress of the Slow the Flow project throughout the Corvedale. This was followed by a site inspection of the leaky dams already built in the Seifton Brook catchment. These have already worked well during recent rains. Mr Dunne was also acquainted with our concerns over the EA’s proposed large increases in the cost of Consents to any works in Rivers. These increases of over 4 times the present costs would price small volunteer groups such as ours out of existence. He will take this up with the relevant Minister. At the same meeting, representatives from the EA confirmed that they were aware of these concerns, which had been expressed by many other similar groups  and that they would be addressed now that the Consultation period was over.

There will be a public Meeting at the Diddlebury Village Hall at 7.30pm on Thursday 15th February at which Luke Neal of the Shropshire Wildlife Trust will present an update on the Slow the Flow project in the Corvedale. This is probably the largest scheme of its kind in the UK.

The Parish Council now kindly send all Planning Applications to the Group for comment on the drainage aspects.

Geoff Neden

27th January 2018

Diddlebury Parish Flood Action Group



Diddlebury Flood Action Group

Notice of Meetings

Green Futures Seminar - 1st February, Craven Arms

The Environment Agency will be giving information to landowners and farmers about the next round of regulations and funding available at 7.00pm in the Craven Arms Community Centre.

Progress on Slow the Flow - 15th February, Diddlebury

A Progress Report on Slow the Flow in the Corvedale will be presented by Luke Neal of the Shropshire Wildlife Trust at the Diddlebury Village Hall at 7.30pm. The talk will be followed by a short film. Refreshments will be provided and after the film, Luke will be available for an informal chat

Diddlebury Flood Action Group

Work Party 22nd October 2017